Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This can result in many potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.

While this sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.


This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research.  how to block radiation  includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for  how to reduce wifi radiation at home  exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.